Or it could be like publishing a paper that says smoking tobacco is harmful and then people cut down their smoking and… become healthier. Like yes you can expl

Or it could be like publishing a paper that says smoking tobacco is harmful and then people cut down their smoking and… become healthier. Like yes you can explain many airway problems with smoking, but does that actually justify not smoking? I hope that helps show that injecting such obvious bias into your examples introduces obvious weaknesses, too.