Here's an interesting theory to consider. The covid-19 vaccines are intended to administered intramuscularly. The resulting immune reaction is intended to be lo

Here's an interesting theory to consider. The covid-19 vaccines are intended to administered intramuscularly. The resulting immune reaction is intended to be localized to that area and generally the expected result is some localized discomfort (and the creation of antibodies) -- so far so good, right? Medical professionals are recommended to perform a technique called intramuscular aspiration. It helps ensure the vaccine is delivered to a localized area. The technique involves injecting the needle, sucking back on the syringe slightly and looking for blood. If there is no blood, push the contents of the syringe into the muscle and complete the vaccine administration. If during aspiration there IS blood, it means the needle may have hit a vein or artery in or near the muscle. At that point, administration should be stopped and the medical professional should re-administer the vaccine in a different location. Here is the theory: Intramuscular aspiration has not been consistently practiced. A certain percentage of covid-19 vaccinations have not been administered locally, but into the circulatory system via a vein or artery. This is not how the vaccine was designed to be administered, and it's not fully clear on what (if any) negative affects may result.