3 ms·
“Concern” in this context is an Improper Noun of sorts https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32673100 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32673100 It’s academic
by dahart 4y ago
“Concern” in this context is an Improper Noun of sorts https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32673100 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32673100 It’s academic speak for ‘I believe this may be incorrect’, and it’s very common to use this word in reviews. The reason “concern” is used over “incorrect” is partly to avoid a direct accusation, which can and sometimes does turn out very bad for the accuser. Note that it was not Semenza who wrote about the “concern”. In addition this word can help establish lack of culpability by the journal and/or publisher after the fact.
- fartsucker69 4y agoaccording to rumors the usage was popularized by scientists working at CERN
- selljamhere 4y agoAnd the rumor continues.
- elashri 4y agoAt CERN, I usually find people using this word more to describe q situation when something is not fully clear more than polite way to say wrong. Usually within the frame of particle physics where heavy statistical analysis is being used.
- cromka 4y agoNot sure if sarcasm (conCERN) or real story?
- everybodyknows 4y agoThe accuser it seems dared only to report under a pseudonym: > the pseudonymous Claire Francis began pointing out potential image duplications and other manipulations in Semenza’s work on PubPeer
- michaelmrose 4y agoThe retraction affirms the claims so it doesn't need anyone's reputation to stand on. Small wonder if the person doesn't want to be known. Groups of people always value community over ethics, correctness, or any other virtue. There is little reason to photoshop the figures risking destruction of reputation unless deeper issues lurk. We are going to see more damning evidence as fast as people can dig through prior results.