4 ms·
It is not the amount of funding, it is the allocation that doomed R&D at big companies. Forty years ago they were the best game in town for applied research (d
by ptero 4y ago
It is not the amount of funding, it is the allocation that doomed R&D at big companies.
Forty years ago they were the best game in town for applied research (defining applied as, on success, having a fast track to commercialization). Later it became similar to the university research: on success, you write some articles, get company wows, but business people have no idea where to stick it and half heartedly throw a few applications at it to see if any stick. Most don't (e.g., deep blue, watson).
At this point large company R&D centers got passed over (by a lot) by VC- funded applied research and saw a (IMO well deserved) drop of funding.
- chrisweekly 4y ago+1 Insightful. Also, in the spirit of helpfulness, "passed over" is the wrong turn of phrase as used here; it implies "declined or rejected" (as in, being passed over for a promotion at work). I think "surpassed" or "leap-frogged" are closer to your intended meaning. HTH! :)
- ptero 4y agoAgreed, thank you! I appreciate corrections for my non-native english speakerness :)