> The law has nothing to say about anything until whatever it is has already gotten into court. That implies that the law doesn't make it prohibitively difficu

> The law has nothing to say about anything until whatever it is has already gotten into court. That implies that the law doesn't make it prohibitively difficult or expensive for someone to go to court and effectively defend their actions against a company with trillions of dollars in assets. We know for example that the law makes it possible for a very wealthy party to drag out or complicate proceedings with the goal of making it prohibitively expensive for a party with less resources to continue. I'd say that counts as the law having something to say before a courtroom (or a verdict) is reached