4 ms·
Totally naive questions: Could we come up with a new protocol (possibly based on SMTP/IMAP/whatever), that would only guarantee to get your email to its recipi
by thewebcount 4y ago
Totally naive questions:
Could we come up with a new protocol (possibly based on SMTP/IMAP/whatever), that would only guarantee to get your email to its recipient if you included some sort of token generated by the recipient and given to you? Something where you could text/message/whatever a unique token to a friend/business/etc. and then they can send you email? And if you email someone, your outgoing email includes the token necessary for them to reply? The contents (including who it’s being sent to) would be encrypted by default rather than being plain text that anyone in between sender and recipient (or at least sender and recipient servers) could read. Is something like that possible?
Obviously at first nobody would have it implemented, so you’d have to get developers interested in writing server and client software, and convince people and companies to use it instead of or in addition to regular email. But I wonder how many people would be interested in such a system and whether it would be workable?
- layer8 4y agoThere is no commercial interest in setting up a new decentralized system, because there is no money in it. And you’d have to get buy-in from all major tech companies for something like that to even remotely have a chance to replace email. Everything else already exists in the vein of Slack, Matrix, iMessage, Line, WeChat, and the like.