4 ms·
Since this was published in 2014 it gives us some space to compare the article's predictions to reality. While Google has certainly been found liable for having
by maxprimer 4y ago
Since this was published in 2014 it gives us some space to compare the article's predictions to reality. While Google has certainly been found liable for having violated some privacy laws there is no evidence of widespread and intentional misuse of personal data at Google. The bigger concern for me personally is the Amazon/Walmart dominance of purchasing data.
- up2isomorphism 4y ago> While Google has certainly been found liable for having violated some privacy laws there is no evidence of widespread and intentional misuse of personal data at Google. "no evidence" means you did not see evidence?
- xboxnolifes 4y agoResponding here means you have evidence to provide?
- up2isomorphism 4y agoThe fact is that google knows you better than your mom and is using this fact to make ad decisions, is there are way you can prevent that from happening? Even if someone took the picture of your private life but have not leaked them yet, does it mean that is not a violation? Saying "no evidence" is just being blind (or pretend to be) at this point.
- xboxnolifes 4y agoSo, you don't have evidence then? Having information about people is not evidence that it is being misused, which in it self requires context of what is "misuse".
- up2isomorphism 4y agoThe evidence is in google’s term of service, if you spent nearly as much time to actually read it than on Internet defending google.
- bagacrap 4y agoIs there such a thing as invisible evidence?
- MKGoogle 4y ago