3 ms·
Well, I kinda like it -- less things to care about, more reason to leave at 5. But it's counterproductive for the company, and some experiments a developer may
by beeforpork 4y ago
Well, I kinda like it -- less things to care about, more reason to leave at 5.
But it's counterproductive for the company, and some experiments a developer may want to quickly do will never be done at all. It kills a lot of creativity. The same holds, of course, for restricting internet access so a dev might never find out whether an interesting looking github tool really is good (for doing productive work!). Also, the company probably wants their products to run on a diverse zoo of machines and OS versions prior to release.
So why a company would take away such access on dev machines is a mystery to me -- probably misguided (and futile) attempts to keep in 'control'.
- thfuran 4y ago>less things to care about, more reason to leave at 5. What do you mean?
- mikewhy 4y agoIf it's not in your power to resolve an issue with your machine by the end of the work day, you should feel no pressure to stay late and fix it.
- ornornor 4y agoEven if it’s in my power to fix, why should I do this overtime? Emergencies can happen where you need to stay an hour or two after EOD, but if it’s more than once a year I’m out, personally, local admin permissions or not.