4 ms·
Well meaning standards never have confusing names?
by eli 4y ago
Well meaning standards never have confusing names?
- colejohnson66 4y agoIf they stopped at USB 3.1 Gen 1 and 2, it’d be forgivable, but then doing USB 3.2 Gens 1, 2, 1x2, and 2x2, then USB4 Gens 2x1, 2x2, 3x1, 3x2, and now USB4 version 2 (what?), it’s hard to give the benefit of the doubt. <rant> Being able to market a USB 3.0 cable as USB4 despite only reaching 5 Gb/s is nothing short of incompetence, and almost certainly deceptive. There’s zero reason to rename old speed capabilities when we still refer to USB 480 Mb/s as… 2.0. If every feature of USB4 is optional besides 5 Gb/s, what’s the purpose of being able to call something “USB4 compatible” besides marketing? It’s the same reason HDMI 2.0 is now 2.1! Because almost every feature that’s new in 2.1 is optional. A few months ago, the media went crazy about Apple listing their new MacBook as supporting HDMI 2.0 when 2.1 had been out for a while, but it turned out they were just being more honest.
- aksss 4y agoYou’re missing a closing tag.
- colejohnson66 4y agoThe spec says it's optional ;)