3 ms·
No, you can get much worse as well when considering heating in general. Heating efficiency is a measure of useful heat, so while of course energy is conserved
by saltcured 4y ago
No, you can get much worse as well when considering heating in general.
Heating efficiency is a measure of useful heat, so while of course energy is conserved in the universe, it is not 100% efficiency as measured, where we consider the consumed energy versus the successful heating of the home. Heat lost to the outside is inefficient.
With natural gas heating, efficiency used to be around 50% as the exhaust gases were quite hot. They just had passive chimney flues driven by natural convection. Improvements to recover more of that heat brought efficiency up to 80% and now approaching 95% in the most modern configurations that I've read about. They now require mechanical ventilation to remove the exhaust and also have condensate drains because the heat exchangers cool the gases so much.
Of course, something like a traditional wood fireplace is much worse than even those old gas furnaces, with a vast amount of energy going out the chimney.
- phyzome 4y agoSorry, I meant to say electrical heating!
- saltcured 4y agoWith electrical heating, if you consider transmission losses you can see that the effective home heating is less than 100% of the generated power. The power lines and equipment warm the outside too. Another benefit of the high COP heat pumps: in reducing the total power consumption at the home, it also brings a proportional reduction in those losses outside the home...