Please don't make this adversarial. I've not introduced a security bug in every for loop I've written. What I've written shouldn't be controversial, just take

Please don't make this adversarial. I've not introduced a security bug in every for loop I've written. What I've written shouldn't be controversial, just take a look at Googles style guide: "We use int very often, for integers we know are not going to be too big, e.g., loop counters. Use plain old int for such things. You should assume that an int is at least 32 bits, but don't assume that it has more than 32 bits. If you need a 64-bit integer type, use int64_t or uint64_t. For integers we know can be "big", use int64_t. You should not use the unsigned integer types such as uint32_t, unless there is a valid reason such as representing a bit pattern rather than a number, or you need defined overflow modulo 2^N. In particular, do not use unsigned types to say a number will never be negative. Instead, use assertions for this. If your code is a container that returns a size, be sure to use a type that will accommodate any possible usage of your container. When in doubt, use a larger type rather than a smaller type. Use care when converting integer types. Integer conversions and promotions can cause undefined behavior, leading to security bugs and other problems."