3 ms·
I wasn't disputing that though. However, because of the batteries included, it has significantly more overhead than lua.
by funklute 4y ago
I wasn't disputing that though. However, because of the batteries included, it has significantly more overhead than lua.
- frou_dh 4y agoI don't think the breadth of the standard library necessarily affects startup time. You only pay the cost for a module when someone imports it, surely.
- funklute 4y agoYes, true - I didn't word that very well. I believe lua is faster than python mostly due to the simplicity of the language implementation itself, but as another comment pointed out, it might not actually be that big a difference (and I don't have any hard numbers at hand).