3 ms·
> Try new things. I broadly agree with you here, but I have a minor side-note to make here: while trying new "new" things, don't forget about old "new" things.
by klibertp 4y ago
> Try new things.
I broadly agree with you here, but I have a minor side-note to make here: while trying new "new" things, don't forget about old "new" things. A technique from the '60s can, and often will be, new to you today, as well as for a vast majority of today's programmers.
I find it incredibly sad that programming as a profession treats its history like a burden to be shunned in favor of yet another unconscious reiteration of a classical concept that gets fashionable in one part of the community for a year or a few, before slipping back into the huge pile of forgotten ideas and implementations.
Try new things, but look for them both on twitter and in archives of many decades prior.
- travisgriggs 4y agoIndeed. And the original that I was replying to actually reads "Try different things". Which as you point out, is even better than my "new".