And that makes writing a correct and portable C futile. Yes, defined-size types are a thing and I almost exclusively use them, but since the size of `int` itsel

And that makes writing a correct and portable C futile. Yes, defined-size types are a thing and I almost exclusively use them, but since the size of `int` itself is unknown and integer promotion depends on that size, the meaning of the code using only defined-size types can still vary across platforms. intN_t etc. are only typedefs and do not form their own type hierarchy, which in my opinion is a huge mistake.