3 ms·
They are categorically the same when it comes to the moral question, because they're both spoken words that cause someone's wrongful death. They are categorica
by hackerlight 4y ago
They are categorically the same when it comes to the moral question, because they're both spoken words that cause someone's wrongful death.
They are categorically different when it comes to the practical question of law regarding how we can come up with a system that doesn't pose undue unintended risks to free expression.
In arguing the latter, free speech purists are often incapable of communicating an understanding of the former.
- platz 4y agolaw is usually more specific and has rules about exactly what is a "cause". In the loose sense you've used here such a rule could be invoked for many things. "Cause" and "Effect" typically need more precise language or rules on what context they apply to.