3 ms·

That you have linked a propaganda state media, instead of an actual UN report :D Srsly though, you clearly aren't dumber than an average journalist, so why not

That you have linked a propaganda state media, instead of an actual UN report :D Srsly though, you clearly aren't dumber than an average journalist, so why not cut the middleman and read UN reports by yourself? You'd be surprised how stuff gets rephrased to have completely different interpretation. Or, even better, gets omitted. E.g you won't see BBC reporting on UN report A/HRC/24/52/Add.1, much less under the headline "Britain may have committed crimes against humanity towards POC - UN"

HyperSane 4y ago
Do you have a point?
- foverzar 4y ago
  ...do you? You've randomly thrown out some random article on BBC, totally unrelated to the context of previous discussion. What "point" were you expecting exactly? (: You aren't really giving me much substance to work with, apart from the fact that you've linked a propaganda state media. So, as there is nothing else to address, I addressed that. So my point is: don't link propaganda state media as it's all two minutes hate and no substance, elaborate on your point so that it is somewhat clear what exactly you want to discuss, and bring some reference example/benchmark on which you would base your comparisons.