3 ms·
> The good thing about both is, that noone is making you consume any of it. Oh man, I'm not particularly susceptible to porn, but I'm a bit conflicted on the s
by vladvasiliu 4y ago
> The good thing about both is, that noone is making you consume any of it.
Oh man, I'm not particularly susceptible to porn, but I'm a bit conflicted on the sugary drinks side. And, generally, on the related "junk foods" (think Snickers bars, etc.).
When I was in college, I used to eat a lot of those, and figured that I wasn't able to control myself whenever I had them in the house. If ate one, I would need to keep on eating. Even now, that I absolutely know better and have first-hand experience with how good I feel when I don't eat those, whenever I get a pack "because surely, I can control myself now, and they sure taste good" I'm bitterly disappointed.
Sure, no one holds a gun to my head forcing me to eat another candy bar, but boy, is there no need for that.
Now, I don't agree with sugary drink bans, nor even with the sugar tax some governments implement. But I do think that maybe some things are inherently dangerous, and perhaps we should make sure everyone knows it. Possibly, a label like "Warning! This may be highly addictive".
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- formerly_proven 4y agoSugar+fat-based foods and GFCS-laced foods are basically addictive drugs and display most associated behaviours and reactions.