5 ms·
If you read the Cloudflare announcement, they stress that this is not general policy and to not see this decision as precedent.
by soulofmischief 4y ago
If you read the Cloudflare announcement, they stress that this is not general policy and to not see this decision as precedent.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- ohCh6zos 4y agoOnce is a mistake, twice is a habit. Cloudflair can't set a precedent and just announce it isn't one.
- dmix 4y agoThis is the third time CF banned a site and it won’t be the last. It gets easier to justify every time and Cloudflare just motivated every deplatforming mob on Twitter. They showed pressure tactics work, just help create an ‘extraordinary’ situation. This is the kind of stuff spies are experts at. It can be learned by motivated online communities to target their enemies.
- soulofmischief 4y agoWell I'm sure we both can look forward to future decentralized anti-ddos solutions
- _-david-_ 4y agoFool me once... They have removed multiple sites after a mob asked them to. How is it not turning into a precedent?
- origin_path 4y agoJust days ago they said they regretted doing it before and wouldn't do it again. How on earth can anything Cloudflare say be trusted now - the CEO literally inverted his stated position within, what, a few days?