4 ms·
Yes that's right. What's missing here is that this doesn't come for free. Requiring to always be able to get information about "what's the progress" without de
by valenterry 4y ago
Yes that's right.
What's missing here is that this doesn't come for free. Requiring to always be able to get information about "what's the progress" without delay means that someone must constantly calculate the current progress. And this is difficult and requires a human that can estimate all the things, including resources (will a dev get sick next week?) and delays from other teams, external blockers and their chance of happening (will the clould environment fail again this week?) and so on.
If this is desired (it may well be) a resource for this has to be planned and implemented _in advance_. That costs a lot of money. And even then, it can just give an estimate in the form of a probablity curve.
If the management has not planned for this, they can either not expect to get status information all the time but have to request it, then wait for it to be calculated and have to accept it will delay the project by the time it takes to calculate it. Or they have to live with an extremely vague and unprecise estimation.
And unfortunately, all methods, be it SCRUM, v-model xt or a randomly assembled method, will not automatically calculate a good estimate. Otherwise no one would complain. :)