>I'm seeing a lot of people making Agile something it isn't/shouldn't be. This is kind of expected. Agile was always very vague about what it was from the get

>I'm seeing a lot of people making Agile something it isn't/shouldn't be. This is kind of expected. Agile was always very vague about what it was from the get go. At this point it's like "god" or "love" - there is no one shared definition and never will be. Rather than arguing over what really is is or should be we should just be quietly deprecating and using a different name for what we think it should have been all along, making an effort to be specific this time. XP was specific and good for the time it just... stayed at version 1.0 forever.