> Just like Gimp can be used to make better results than Photoshop (or even mspaint), the quality of the results is up to the artist/user, not the tool itself.

> Just like Gimp can be used to make better results than Photoshop (or even mspaint), the quality of the results is up to the artist/user, not the tool itself. There's a huge difference between Gimp/Photoshop and an image generation model. If a particular model can't generate faces properly then the "artist/user" can't get around that unless they develop a new model or find one that can fix the output of the first.