4 ms·
> I've seen some of the ugliest yet most functional software done in foxpro. The question was, what, after dBase/FoxPro? In 2000s, there wasn’t a single proper
by eastbound 4y ago
> I've seen some of the ugliest yet most functional software done in foxpro.
The question was, what, after dBase/FoxPro? In 2000s, there wasn’t a single proper stack. I did an internship in 2003 to migrate a company owner’s awesome dBase system into this awful architecture.
- VB6 was rejected because it didn’t integrate a DB,
- .Net was way-too-hard for the quidams they were.
> Budgets blew up, so did team sizes
Nowadays people can’t have a custom DB. We tell them to use Facebook’s CRM, because they wouldn’t be able to hire a 120k$ engineer, who are billed at this rate because they are n-times more productive than a grandpa with WinFox.
Are we really that productive?
- fomine3 4y agoYou mean after MS Access? Agree that current situation is bad.