3 ms·
Unless I'm missing something very obvious, the source repository https://github.com/streetwriters/notesnook https://github.com/streetwriters/notesnook only incl
by lopkeny12ko 4y ago
Unless I'm missing something very obvious, the source repository https://github.com/streetwriters/notesnook https://github.com/streetwriters/notesnook only includes the client apps and not the server, and the parent organization "streetwriters" doesn't seem to have any other repositories for the server. How are you supposed to run your own instance without that?
There's also a lot of marketing-speak in the repository documentation and little to no documentation on how to actually deploy it. Overall this leaves a pretty bad taste in my mouth.
Compare this for example to Bookstack, which gets right to the point for how to install and deploy, with no marketing nonsense. https://github.com/BookStackApp/BookStack https://github.com/BookStackApp/BookStack
- snthd 4y agohttps://notesnook.com/roadmap/ https://notesnook.com/roadmap/ >September onwards >Open source sync server + self hosting
- generalizations 4y agoThen I guess after september they can call it "fully open source". For now, it's closed source with an open source client.
- lupire 4y agoWhat reason is there for not pushing the server to GitHub now?
- Xylakant 4y agoI can think of a few: * not ready * in technical review * in legal review (can all code be published under an OS license?) * in security review * missing documentation I’m sure there’s plenty of other possible reasons. They seem to have a roadmap that they want to follow, so that implies they have thought about what they need in place to open source the components.
- lupire 4y agoFlagged the submission for misleading title.