3 ms·
That would absolutely be more work than just subbing in an image and would neither have worked in the original implementation nor the various frontends it's bee
by IanCal 4y ago
That would absolutely be more work than just subbing in an image and would neither have worked in the original implementation nor the various frontends it's been used in.
This is quite a classic HN kind of comment. Immediately assumes specific problematic intent and proposes a solution that doesn't fit the API.
- macrolime 4y agoNow instead users have to spend hours upon hours editing docker images to remove it. Much easier.
- IanCal 4y agoThat's neither true not would it have been helped by making the original code require input during generation. They put a simple check in, that tries to avoid returning nsfw images so that you don't get that back despite a more 'innocent' prompt. It's trivial to remove and is only part of the demonstration scripts, it is not part of the model or anything fundamental to it's workings.