3 ms·
The distinction the parent post making is that, it was an agent provocateur who intentionally did things that would have crossed the line into actionable threat
by ok123456 4y ago
The distinction the parent post making is that, it was an agent provocateur who intentionally did things that would have crossed the line into actionable threats of harm. If that's true, it would seem to be an effective way of silencing people.
This also is how authoritarian governments create cause to neutralize groups.
- dillondoyle 4y agoLooking through that lens there are/were far more than one agent provocateurs. and in that case what's the difference.