3 ms·

The rest is context for readers on who's being defended by the ceo and rest

• skissane 4y ago
  I think if you used to work with someone, and now they are dead – being upset at people publicly attacking them, when they aren't around to defend themselves, is a very understandable human reaction. eastdakota's reaction here is very human.
  • wahnfrieden 4y ago
    They weren't attacked, Cf was attacked for employing them and their allies. Cf has a habit of financially supporting actual far-right activists such as Westboro Church, besides this. They are under watch. more context on the employee at the time - https://twitter.com/Slendy5127/status/1565764927498903552 https://twitter.com/Slendy5127/status/1565764927498903552 edit because reply is broken: they donated money to Westboro aka GODHATESFAGS[.]COM
    • skissane 4y ago
      > They weren't attacked, Cf was attacked for employing them That sentence is illogical. Attacking X's employer for employing X is an attack on X – it is saying that X is unworthy of being employed > Cf has a habit of financially supporting actual far-right activists such as Westboro Church You make it sound like they donated money to WBC. From what I understand, at one point they accepted them as a paying customer. WBC is an atrocious organisation, but a business having them as a customer isn't "financial support" – do you apply the same standard to the many other businesses who undoubtedly have WBC and/or its leaders and members among their customers? Who is their cell carrier? What supermarket do they shop at? Which airline do they fly?
    • _-david-_ 4y ago
      > they donated money to Westboro aka GODHATESFAGS[.]COM Do you have any proof of this?