3 ms·

Technically, true threats and "incitement to imminent lawless action" are separate doctrines. https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1025/true-threats ht

Technically, true threats and "incitement to imminent lawless action" are separate doctrines. https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1025/true-threats https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1025/true-threa... https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/970/incitement-to-imminent-lawless-action https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/970/incitement-to-i...

JumpCrisscross 4y ago
> true threats and "incitement to imminent lawless action" are separate doctrines Wasn't aware, thank you. That said, this message [1] sounds an awful lot like "the speaker mean[t] to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual" [2]. Aside: And with that tweet read, I'm out. Happy Labor Day weekend folks. [1] https://twitter.com/keffals/status/1566153033586810885 https://twitter.com/keffals/status/1566153033586810885 [2] https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/538/343/case.pdf https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/538/343/case.pdf