4 ms·
Cloudflare is a private busniess and can refute service ofc, but should the owner not get some notice of the termination to move to another service in time?
by rejectfinite 4y ago
Cloudflare is a private busniess and can refute service ofc, but should the owner not get some notice of the termination to move to another service in time?
- hammyhavoc 4y agoYou mean coverage in mainstream media outlets and the angry mob wasn't enough of a canary in the coalmine for their non-biz? Literally, they just point their domain at new DNS. It takes seconds. Who is going to want to do biz with KF?
- Vecr 4y agoActually I think Cloudflare holds the DNS names for the .net name, as well as possibly others. The reason I think this is because they are DNSSEC validated, and the .ru name does not have DNSSEC.
- convery 4y agoThe operator posted this on Telegram: "Cloudflare's decision to block the site was done without any discussion. The message I've received is a vague suspension notice. The message from Matthew Prince is unclear. If there is any threat to life on the site, I have received no communication from any law enforcement."
- kevingadd 4y agoIf you want a termination notice you should work with a hosting provider that guarantees one in their terms. I wouldn't be surprised if most providers have special clauses that entitle them to cut you off instantly, though. There are probably cases where law enforcement would demand that they do it anyway.
- rejectfinite 4y ago>There are probably cases where law enforcement would demand that they do it anyway Yes but here Cloudflare claims that law enforcement was "too slow"