4 ms·
No, their argument was that they shouldn't do anything about it because the two times they did it wound up causing every tinpot dictatorship to show up on their
by EarlKing 4y ago
No, their argument was that they shouldn't do anything about it because the two times they did it wound up causing every tinpot dictatorship to show up on their doorstep and demand they do the same for people that hadn't done anything wrong except piss off the wrong dictator. This is why rights exist in the first place: so that when some idiot erroneously says your sight is "enabling doxxing, harassment and DDOS-for-hire" when all you actually do is document the bad behavior of bad individuals on the internet, well, you don't get run out of town on a pole... because the guy with the pole knows that today it's you, but tomorrow it could be him.
- braingenious 4y ago> times they did it wound up causing every tinpot dictatorship to show up on their doorstep and demand they do the same for people that hadn't done anything wrong except piss off the wrong dictator Which they wielded their unlimited power to ignore.
- stavros 4y agoAnd felt like they shouldn't be the ones judging whom to ignore and whom to not, yes.
- braingenious 4y agoWhat? Cloudflare picks who to ignore every day. Nearly everybody that has a public email address has to decide who to ignore every day. What is so important about Cloudflare’s “feelings”?
- stavros 4y agoAh, sorry, I replied before I realized you were trolling. Carry on.
- braingenious 4y agoAh sorry, I replied before I realized that you weren’t interested in actually discussing the topic.