3 ms·
Methalox ends up being preferable because Hydrogen ends up performing relatively similarly when accounting for the extra tank mass needed to effectively contain
by dotnet00 4y ago
Methalox ends up being preferable because Hydrogen ends up performing relatively similarly when accounting for the extra tank mass needed to effectively contain it (both in terms of thicker walls and larger tanks in general). Methalox can't achieve Hydrogen ISPs but in exchange it's much easier to contain, allowing for much lighter and simpler tanks, resulting in similar deltaV overall.
On top of that cryo methane and oxygen are at closer temperatures than hydrogen and oxygen, which simplifies storage further.
So effectively the difference is that Hydrogen embrittles everything and makes development more expensive even without reuse considerations, making Methane superior unless you're SLS and being wasteful is a feature.
- Gibbon1 4y agoIt's been a while but it seemed to me that high ISP isn't very big win for the first stage anyways. Basically linear with everything being equal which as you mention it isn't. So slightly lower ISP means slightly heavy first stage. Either way it's disappointing NASA is determined to keep the Space Shuttle's white tech elephant going.