5 ms·
>Seems to me they're operating on a matter of principle. That’s what I’m talking about. The “principle” argument is genuinely funny! They have unlimited power
by braingenious 4y ago
>Seems to me they're operating on a matter of principle.
That’s what I’m talking about. The “principle” argument is genuinely funny! They have unlimited power but because they’ve chosen to follow an arbitrary rule based on their arbitrary definition of neutrality, they have no power. It’s a coincidence that they enable doxxing, harassment and DDOS-for-hire because they’re religiously bound by a sacred covenant! They dare not cross the ancient gods lest blood and pestilence rain down upon all our heads!
They’re not making a choice to continue enabling harassment, doxxing and DDOS-for-hire, they are simply doing as the sacred runes prescribe, as all orthodox stewards of the realm should and would do. It’s actually noble, we should actually be thanking them for acting this way.
It’s just plain funny.
As for your food bank analogy, do they provide food for active murderers and pedophiles? Like, if they were visited by current victims and the families of victims asking them for help, would they respond with a box of food for the perpetrators and tell the victims to kick rocks?
- ThrowawayTestr 4y ago>DDOS-for-hire KF uses cloudflair specifically because it's haters try to DDOS the site.
- OrangeMonkey 4y agoThe only reason someone would advocate to turn off ddos protection for a site, is so someone can perform terroristic acts against the site and ddos it until it goes down. How about it - you tell me. What reason would so many people, maybe in this thread chain, argue so strongly for a company to revoke its ddos protection of a website they dont like. Its weird right?
- braingenious 4y agoI would suggest that you take that question up with Cloudflare, as they just disabled DDOS protection for KF.
- OrangeMonkey 4y agoGot it - but I'm asking you. It appears you were hoping that they would remove it. What possible reason did you have to hope that a site took away their ddos protection? Its weird right?
- braingenious 4y agoI would suggest you take up that question with Cloudflare. Based off your previous statements, they’re now supporting “terroristic” acts. I’m not sure why you would want the opinion of some internet stranger over a corporation that is now directly supporting terrorism by your estimation. It is weird!
- unethical_ban 4y agoThis, my fellow citizens, is what we call a "bad faith actor". They volunteer a position on questionable premises, get asked about their internal philosophical consistency, then dodge the question.
- braingenious 4y agoI agree, the poster that was very obviously and hamhandedly trying to get me to say something that they could then twist into “I support terrorism” or whatever was indeed acting in bad faith. Thank you for highlighting this.
- unethical_ban 4y ago
- unethical_ban 4y agoYou tried to get an answer out, but unfortunately some users here have no scruples.
- pixl97 4y ago