4 ms·
> It’s also baffling the parents didn’t try to buy the goat off the purchaser I think they did? That's how I read "Long offered to “pay back” the fair for the
by Beltalowda 4y ago
> It’s also baffling the parents didn’t try to buy the goat off the purchaser
I think they did? That's how I read "Long offered to “pay back” the fair for the loss of Cedar’s income" anyway.
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> Long offered to “pay back” the fair for the loss of Cedar’s income It wasn’t the Fair’s property. It was the purchaser’s. The loss of income wasn’t the point. The property interest was.
- Beltalowda 4y agoOh okay, I think I don't fully understand how all of this works. Either way, regardless of the legality of the matter, I don't think you should confuse "the legal thing to do" with "the moral thing to do". They are not always identical.