The discussion here seems to be whether, if we can capture all of the relevant details, a certain person is making a rationally optimal decision. Taking this to

The discussion here seems to be whether, if we can capture all of the relevant details, a certain person is making a rationally optimal decision. Taking this to its logical conclusion we're fitting math to a process of decision making and adjudicating which criteria are considered rational and which are not. Sure there is mathematics involved here, but it reads a lot more like a question of who is our isn't allowed agency, in this case in their economic and financial decisions.