> The fact that for amazon getting rid of unions is a priority, suggests that unions are effective Well, it suggests that unions are effective at creating nega

> The fact that for amazon getting rid of unions is a priority, suggests that unions are effective Well, it suggests that unions are effective at creating negative consequences for the company. Those consequences could be "more costly to do business because the employees are paid more"; in theory, a good outcome. They could also be "more costly to do business because it's not against the rules for someone to plug in the monitor in their office because all electronics must be handled by a certified union member" (which actually happens); in theory, a bad outcome. Not all "bad for the company" things are "good for the employees".