The comment I'm replying to is showing a shade of grey, but this is a valid perspective, and reminds me of how Feynman attacked poorly worded, vague, or academi

The comment I'm replying to is showing a shade of grey, but this is a valid perspective, and reminds me of how Feynman attacked poorly worded, vague, or academic questions. I disagree that this reasoning is tangential to the question; it's an ill-defined question, and this comment's take pokes at that in the right place.