3 ms·
Try reading my comment again more slowly. You based your response on an accidental misreading of what I said (you swapped "at all" to "to all").
by bowsamic 4y ago
Try reading my comment again more slowly. You based your response on an accidental misreading of what I said (you swapped "at all" to "to all").
- Cupertino95014 4y agoAh, right, sorry. "At all" is equally fatuous, though. The philosophical problem of whether objective knowledge is attainable was settled centuries ago. "How do you really know that Einstein's Relativity is valid?" is something that was settled when its predictions were borne out. If there are still questions about it, those will be settled by more science.
- bowsamic 4y agoIdk, I side with Kant on this issue. Hegel has not convinced me yet. Maybe he has convinced you