Hmm, that explains why they are "reviews" (with verifiable names) instead of just ratings (untraceable externally). Fortuitous interesting excursion on arXiv:

Hmm, that explains why they are "reviews" (with verifiable names) instead of just ratings (untraceable externally). Fortuitous interesting excursion on arXiv: top-200 heavy physics papers readers, "2010 Institutional arXiv Usage Data" at http://arxiv.org/help/support/2010_usage http://arxiv.org/help/support/2010_usage