> It really obviously is up for debate "obviously" to you, I guess. Not to anyone else who realizes that life expectancy beyond 30 and absence of periodic fami

> It really obviously is up for debate "obviously" to you, I guess. Not to anyone else who realizes that life expectancy beyond 30 and absence of periodic famines with mass starvation is the result of objectivity. > whether objective knowledge is accessible at all How to make steel, plumb our houses, cure our bacterial infections, and bring A/C power to them is not knowledge that's "accessible to all." Most of us are happy that someone somewhere knows how to do those things. That's called "division of labor." > whether objective knowledge is accessible at all Kind of like the missing link in the fossil record which causes creationists to say "Look! Darwin was wrong!": quantum mechanics is the difficult-to-understand problem giving an easy out to people who don't believe in science anyway. Give it a rest.