> So when I read “dead body” I’m picturing someone who’s beyond the realm of possible resuscitation. I think you are possibly attributing a much stronger defin

> So when I read “dead body” I’m picturing someone who’s beyond the realm of possible resuscitation. I think you are possibly attributing a much stronger definition to "dead," that is incorrect. Dead merely means lifeless, no longer alive, or deceased. It does not mean, "beyond the possibility of resuscitation," at least not in any definition I have seen. Many have in fact died and been resuscitated. Whether this is legitimately resurrection, being raised from the dead, is where I have probably been playing fast and loose, because I don't believe a body is required for resurrection, but a body is always required for resuscitation.