> "These companies" now have basically zero incentive to support them or to sic "PR goons" on their opponents. Bro. They have new drugs that are a molecule di

> "These companies" now have basically zero incentive to support them or to sic "PR goons" on their opponents. Bro. They have new drugs that are a molecule different which they sell instead. And your scorn notwithstanding, they do have entire division of goons, whose explicit purpose is to alter opinion online, in academia, in politics, etc. > There are also legitimate concerns about biases in the evidence base for claims about the efficacy of psychedelics Pfft. Same goes for pharma drugs. > And yes, psychedelics have side effects: I didn't say they don't. The side effects are on a different level though. We're talking about companies that knowingly sold AIDS infected products, among other atrocities. You'd wanna be a little less naive.