On the founder of this absurd view: > he posited whole language as a rejection of “negative, elitist, racist views of linguistic purity” and compared advocates

On the founder of this absurd view: > he posited whole language as a rejection of “negative, elitist, racist views of linguistic purity” and compared advocates of phonics to flat-Earthers. Great, another failed policy constructed for the totally wrong reasons which ends up harming those it was claimed to benefit most.