I think most people actually doing something with this technology will be making the maker argument: "Unless you have real-world means to make your opinions re

I think most people actually doing something with this technology will be making the maker argument: "Unless you have real-world means to make your opinions reality ... I don't care about your opinions" Which goes both in the positive and the negative. Both "show it working or you can't do it" and the negative "prevent me from making it working or shut up". You have zero means to prevent such use of the technology ... Add to that trillions of dollars in reasons not to outlaw the technology itself. Attempts to enforce this will be worse, much worse, than the war on drugs. Plus, frankly, drugs do a lot more harm than just allowing this fully would do, so hopefully that will mean less attention going into this.