2 ms·
USB9 V1.742.ac/3 ... it is important to be precise here, because otherwise, the cable will be incompatible and the systems involved will fall back into a safe m
by DocTomoe 4y ago
USB9 V1.742.ac/3 ... it is important to be precise here, because otherwise, the cable will be incompatible and the systems involved will fall back into a safe mode that's essentially, but not quite USB 1.0 standards. /s
So, why exactly wasn't USB4 2.0 not called USB 4.2?
- nani8ot 4y agoThey had to call it USB4 2.0 because the previous generation was USB4. How could they change their naming scheme to something like 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, that would confuse consumers!