7 ms·

Nokia N9 was the best phone I have ever owned. To these days their gesture navigation implementation is the best. And they had Swype keyboard preinstalled. Sp

by koiueo 4y ago

Nokia N9 was the best phone I have ever owned. To these days their gesture navigation implementation is the best. And they had Swype keyboard preinstalled. Speaking of apps: Here maps, SoundHound, amazing mail client and calendar... Gosh I miss that phone. I used mine for about 3 years, I think, and sold it for more than a half of its original price in literally a couple of hours (which means my price was too low). By the time the software started showing its age: no banking apps, browser failing to display more and more modern sites... I believe, they should have pushed with Meego. With vendor support their OS could've been a hit.

alfiedotwtf 4y ago
> Nokia N9 was the best phone I have ever owned. I'll counter with the Nokia N900. > I believe, they should have pushed with Meego. With vendor support their OS could've been a hit. So say we all.
- pengaru 4y ago
  > I'll counter with the Nokia N900. I've never understood this about N900 fans. My experience with the N9 was great, and never left me wishing I could go back to something more like a Sharp Zaurus with modern cell connectivity. What is it that makes the N900 appealing? Is it strictly the physical keyboard? So the N950 would have been the N900 killer? Or was there something else about it?
  - pluijzer 4y ago
    The N900 was my favorite phone by far. Most of the reason come as a programmer, not all users might value them. First of all ot was a true Linux phone. Running a derivative of Debian, complete with apt etc. Most of the apps on it, even the app to make a phone call where preexisting open source Linux applications with a nice mobile UI. An UI that was clean and consistent without the need off branding that other platforms suffer from. I could simply write bash script for it to extend its functionality. For example I remember writing a script that would record and sent recordings of phone calls to my server. I installed Pidgin the chat client and used it to chat with my friends when MSN was still popular in my county. It truly felt like having a PC in your pocket. The keyboard was the best keyboard ever made in my opinion. I could actually type blind on it sensing a message without looking at the phone at all. I still own 3 N900's with the hope of every managing the find the enthusiasm to rig in the another phone or a pi.
    - alfiedotwtf 4y ago
      Totally agree! I've had them all, including a Zaurus, various Palms with phone, various XDAs, Nokia N900, Free Runner, Firefox phone, Ubuntu phone, you name it... but IMHO the N900 was the best form factor and UI - the only reason why I got rid of it was the band didn't support where I was traveling to. Still sad the NEO 900 went nowhere. I would jump at that. Still interested in trying the Purism and PinePhone, but with my time as limited as it is, I'll stick to my Pixel 4a running LineageOS for now - but can't wait to get me back a pure Linux phone that works without issues!
    - cycomanic 4y ago
      But all this points also apply to the N9, it was a fully fleshed Linux system and arguably qt for writing apps was significantly more comfortable for developers than the custom framework based on gtk. I even recall that it was quite straight forward to port desktop apps, with very minor adjustments. On top of that it was actually usable for normal users which the n900 failed at, largely due to not being usable in many networks due to the radio IIRC. The UI of the N9 was also much more polished. So unless you never used an N9 I don't understand how you would prefer the N900 (except for the keyboard).
      - alfiedotwtf 4y ago
        > I don't understand how you would prefer the N900 (except for the keyboard) The keyboard made it. It was very usable too. I took it once to a hackathon and was able to follow along nicely.
  - sicelo 4y ago
    > I've never understood this about N900 fans. > Or was there something else about it? It's pretty simple: hacker vs. user points of view i used both N9 and N900. N9 was a way more polished, user-centric device. I love the UX and even how the device looks however, for (low-level) hackers, N9/N950 was a bit hostile environment compared to N900. The first major stumbling block was Aegis (somewhat similar to Samsung's Knox perhaps). With N900, you can just boot any other Linux by simply loading u-boot to memory using the flasher. Nothing else. N9/N950's Aegis prevented that kind of luxury, so you needed to mess with the OS first, deal with permanent ominous warranty warning, and risk bricking it (see https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=81579 https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=81579). On the other hand, N900 is basically unbrickable. So N950 loses to N900 because of these reasons, even though it has a keyboard, a somewhat better one in fact
    - seba_dos1 4y ago
      Yup, that's spot on. N9 felt good to use, but it was a disappointing device once you got used to the level of openness in a commercially supported product that N900 provided. Still better than pretty much every alternative at that time though.
  - specialp 4y ago
    N900 was also the first phone with a full on browser capable of running any site. Other phones then were not able to run full JS. Also the resolution was higher than other phones.
  - Zash 4y ago
    The physical keyboard was certainly nice, especially for a linux sysadmin / programmer. I also miss the camera, the "normal" and familiar Linux environment, the unified messaging (native XMPP support, with A/V calling!). It was sturdy despite the moving (keyboard) parts. Phone experience was decent, certainly better than my current Android, but can't beat my first phone, the Nokia 3310.
coffee_beqn 4y ago
Linux and Nokia were at one point the Crown Jewels of Finnish tech. One still remains. Would’ve been a match made in heaven but I believe they needed Microsoft’s cash to keep the company running. I remember testing the N900 at their store and was really impressed but I think it was too little too late
- BossingAround 4y ago
  N900 was awesome, but it wasn't what the masses wanted. It had a lot of quirks, like UI freezing when someone calls you so you couldn't answer the call and suffering from slowing down over a relatively short period of time while being price competitive with the other high end phones. N900 was a great beta. We never got a 1.0 though.
  - toyg 4y ago
    The 1.0 was the N9. It had excellent reviews. Sadly it was commercially stillborn - Nokia had already publicly switched to Microsoft's bullshit, so it got no commercial push, and nobody wants to buy a dead phone.
    - stuaxo 4y ago
      Such a shame, I really wanted one but couldn't justify it. Eventually got a Sailfish Jolla.
  - panick21_ 4y ago
    I really wanted the N900 and was ready to buy the next version. But it never came. By the time the N9 arrived it was already clear that it was dead. Some of the bugs you describe could have been fixed with simple software updates.
RajT88 4y ago
Symbian was the biggest problem with Nokia phones. The hardware was always amazing. I owned a Communicator 9290, and have yet to have a phone that performed as well on speaker. Bar none. Noise cancelling and volume both. I had an e90, and although it was less amazing on that front, the build quality, and look at feel just was... Great! I'd pay iPhone Pro prices for (basically) an e90 running Android with a decent camera. Nobody's made one yet, but I keep hoping. And yes, in a matter of weeks I'll have my Astro Slide from Planet Computers, but I have little doubt the form factor will still fall short of the dream of a truly pocket phone you can type decently well on.
- cycomanic 4y ago
  The N9 was not Symbian though. What I read was that there was a serious management culture issue at Nokia. Even before Elop Meego efforts were seriously sabotaged by the Symbian camp (the N9 was significantly delayed for example) . Mind you that memo and the decisions made were either incredibly stupid or part of a strategy by the shareholders to break apart Nokia. I mean apart from the fact that you tell the public that you don't believe in your product while selling it, they also decided to axe the Meego version N9 successor even though it was essentially ready. Many believe that was done to not risk it being a success, which would have revealed the whole strategy change to be wrong.
- KronisLV 4y ago
  > Symbian was the biggest problem with Nokia phones. I actually miss it, those were simpler times where your phone didn't spam you with ads or notifications or didn't get outdated every 2 years. No constant data collection or surveillance to the scales we deal with now. More so, I actually miss the feeling of how new everything was, in the sense that is you wanted to play some games you'd sometimes scour WAP sites for the game files (or pay exorbitant fees through magazines). There was a certain charm to games back then, too, seeing what people could knock together with Java on such a limited platform. Games like Gravity Defied, Galaxy on Fire or Gish, or even Doom RPG. I'm kind of nostalgic, admittedly, maybe for a time when not everything was so well optimized towards monetization. And before Wirth's law became so present on our devices.
kQq9oHeAz6wLLS 4y ago
> Here maps HERE was spun off, and is a great platform today. HERE WeGo is available for Android and iOS, plus web.
- Joeri 4y ago
  Nokia transit / HERE transit was my favorite public transit app back when I used windows phone. It had a unique way [1] of presenting transit options that was far more convenient than the simple list that every other app does. Sadly the current HERE WeGo app also does the simple scrolling list, so I see no reason to use it. [1] https://mspoweruser.com/nokia-here-transit-now-covers-46-uk-cities/ https://mspoweruser.com/nokia-here-transit-now-covers-46-uk-...
  - morsch 4y ago
    Oeffi presents transit options in the same way. Don't know if the style has a name. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach.oeffi https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach....
mariusor 4y ago
Did you try the Jolla phones? They tried to carry the Meego torch in their Sailfish OS (which currently works well with "last year's" Sony phones). Even though it has different UI decisions than the N9 I found it reasonably good over time, and today some of it's decisions (like using swipes for navigation) made their way into other mainstream mobile OSes.
- idonotknowwhy 4y ago
  I bought the Xperia X and paid for Jolla with android support. It's a horrible buggy mess. Nothing like the smooth experience of the meego/Maemo n9
  - mariusor 4y ago
    Weird, I had an Xperia XA2 for a long time and it was the opposite, no bugs to speak of. Now with a Xperia 10 III it's still pretty good.
idonotknowwhy 4y ago
Agreed. I loved my Nokia N9. The software was great! The Nokia N9 alarm clock was the best alarm clock app I've ever used. Android have copied some elements of this but it's nowhere near as simple! The hardware was fantastic as well. I dropped mine several times without a case and it never broke. The TI dac sounded great with my Sony XBA-3 iems I had at the time. I did hate the USB port cover though. And hated that they didn't have a dedicated camera button like the N8 and n97.
- exodust 4y ago
  The N9 was a regrettable purchase for me. I even feel that Nokia owes me, all these years later! Paid a lot for the 64 gig N9. Soon after Nokia abandoned the OS, and I felt ripped off. I remember the flash refused to stay off. I would disable flash for a photo, but next time I used camera the flash was back on. This was enough to move to a phone that remembered the flash setting. Years later I tried to start my N9 but it was demanding a password that I didn't know. Some kind of recovery password I never knew I had set up. There was no way I could find to reset the phone even to factory settings. It's basically bricked with no way to restore, so I couldn't even sell it as a working phone.
sgloutnikov 4y ago
Aw man the N9, good times. I still rock my glossy white N9 from time to time. Just realized that thing had 64GB of storage in 2011.
- durnygbur 4y ago
  That thing had also fully functional car navigation with all maps for free, and it had busybox shell... gosh how miserable are we now with smartphone options...
pharmakom 4y ago
How would Meego have succeeded where Windows Phone, which had Microsoft’s backing, failed?
- black3r 4y ago
  Applications. You can't take an existing Windows app and run it on Windows Phone, because the APIs are not there. You can take an existing Linux app and run it on Meego, because it's just a regular ARM Linux with a custom UI.
- panick21_ 4y ago
  Microsoft backing is a help? Seems to me having the backing of the Linux community would have been way better. Making UI for mostly existing apps, porting lots of existing apps over. Lots of free continues investments. Like you get other companies on board who use the same basic distro and apps and help with bug fixes and so on. You can use the same distro on phones, tables and even sell laptops with that software on it. And you can do all of that for no cost to anybody. Every single Nokia with Windows gives money away to Microsoft.
javier2 4y ago
Lol, I had an N900 and it was clunky at best. It was ok as a tech preview, but it wasnt a fantastic product by any means.
- fignews 4y ago
  The N900 did NOT run Meego. I agree with OP 100% that the N9 was an amazing phone. Honestly it was brilliant. Super smooth and well thought out. Polished too. With an android emulation layer on top it could have been a success. Alas Nokia got Elop’d.

by koiueo 4y ago

alfiedotwtf 4y ago

> Nokia N9 was the best phone I have ever owned. I'll counter with the Nokia N900. > I believe, they should have pushed with Meego. With vendor support their OS could've been a hit. So say we all.

pengaru 4y ago
> I'll counter with the Nokia N900. I've never understood this about N900 fans. My experience with the N9 was great, and never left me wishing I could go back to something more like a Sharp Zaurus with modern cell connectivity. What is it that makes the N900 appealing? Is it strictly the physical keyboard? So the N950 would have been the N900 killer? Or was there something else about it?
- pluijzer 4y ago
  The N900 was my favorite phone by far. Most of the reason come as a programmer, not all users might value them. First of all ot was a true Linux phone. Running a derivative of Debian, complete with apt etc. Most of the apps on it, even the app to make a phone call where preexisting open source Linux applications with a nice mobile UI. An UI that was clean and consistent without the need off branding that other platforms suffer from. I could simply write bash script for it to extend its functionality. For example I remember writing a script that would record and sent recordings of phone calls to my server. I installed Pidgin the chat client and used it to chat with my friends when MSN was still popular in my county. It truly felt like having a PC in your pocket. The keyboard was the best keyboard ever made in my opinion. I could actually type blind on it sensing a message without looking at the phone at all. I still own 3 N900's with the hope of every managing the find the enthusiasm to rig in the another phone or a pi.
  - alfiedotwtf 4y ago
    Totally agree! I've had them all, including a Zaurus, various Palms with phone, various XDAs, Nokia N900, Free Runner, Firefox phone, Ubuntu phone, you name it... but IMHO the N900 was the best form factor and UI - the only reason why I got rid of it was the band didn't support where I was traveling to. Still sad the NEO 900 went nowhere. I would jump at that. Still interested in trying the Purism and PinePhone, but with my time as limited as it is, I'll stick to my Pixel 4a running LineageOS for now - but can't wait to get me back a pure Linux phone that works without issues!
  - cycomanic 4y ago
    But all this points also apply to the N9, it was a fully fleshed Linux system and arguably qt for writing apps was significantly more comfortable for developers than the custom framework based on gtk. I even recall that it was quite straight forward to port desktop apps, with very minor adjustments. On top of that it was actually usable for normal users which the n900 failed at, largely due to not being usable in many networks due to the radio IIRC. The UI of the N9 was also much more polished. So unless you never used an N9 I don't understand how you would prefer the N900 (except for the keyboard).
    - alfiedotwtf 4y ago
      > I don't understand how you would prefer the N900 (except for the keyboard) The keyboard made it. It was very usable too. I took it once to a hackathon and was able to follow along nicely.
- sicelo 4y ago
  > I've never understood this about N900 fans. > Or was there something else about it? It's pretty simple: hacker vs. user points of view i used both N9 and N900. N9 was a way more polished, user-centric device. I love the UX and even how the device looks however, for (low-level) hackers, N9/N950 was a bit hostile environment compared to N900. The first major stumbling block was Aegis (somewhat similar to Samsung's Knox perhaps). With N900, you can just boot any other Linux by simply loading u-boot to memory using the flasher. Nothing else. N9/N950's Aegis prevented that kind of luxury, so you needed to mess with the OS first, deal with permanent ominous warranty warning, and risk bricking it (see https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=81579 https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=81579). On the other hand, N900 is basically unbrickable. So N950 loses to N900 because of these reasons, even though it has a keyboard, a somewhat better one in fact
  - seba_dos1 4y ago
    Yup, that's spot on. N9 felt good to use, but it was a disappointing device once you got used to the level of openness in a commercially supported product that N900 provided. Still better than pretty much every alternative at that time though.
- specialp 4y ago
  N900 was also the first phone with a full on browser capable of running any site. Other phones then were not able to run full JS. Also the resolution was higher than other phones.
- Zash 4y ago
  The physical keyboard was certainly nice, especially for a linux sysadmin / programmer. I also miss the camera, the "normal" and familiar Linux environment, the unified messaging (native XMPP support, with A/V calling!). It was sturdy despite the moving (keyboard) parts. Phone experience was decent, certainly better than my current Android, but can't beat my first phone, the Nokia 3310.

coffee_beqn 4y ago

Linux and Nokia were at one point the Crown Jewels of Finnish tech. One still remains. Would’ve been a match made in heaven but I believe they needed Microsoft’s cash to keep the company running. I remember testing the N900 at their store and was really impressed but I think it was too little too late

BossingAround 4y ago
N900 was awesome, but it wasn't what the masses wanted. It had a lot of quirks, like UI freezing when someone calls you so you couldn't answer the call and suffering from slowing down over a relatively short period of time while being price competitive with the other high end phones. N900 was a great beta. We never got a 1.0 though.
- toyg 4y ago
  The 1.0 was the N9. It had excellent reviews. Sadly it was commercially stillborn - Nokia had already publicly switched to Microsoft's bullshit, so it got no commercial push, and nobody wants to buy a dead phone.
  - stuaxo 4y ago
    Such a shame, I really wanted one but couldn't justify it. Eventually got a Sailfish Jolla.
- panick21_ 4y ago
  I really wanted the N900 and was ready to buy the next version. But it never came. By the time the N9 arrived it was already clear that it was dead. Some of the bugs you describe could have been fixed with simple software updates.

RajT88 4y ago

Symbian was the biggest problem with Nokia phones. The hardware was always amazing. I owned a Communicator 9290, and have yet to have a phone that performed as well on speaker. Bar none. Noise cancelling and volume both. I had an e90, and although it was less amazing on that front, the build quality, and look at feel just was... Great! I'd pay iPhone Pro prices for (basically) an e90 running Android with a decent camera. Nobody's made one yet, but I keep hoping. And yes, in a matter of weeks I'll have my Astro Slide from Planet Computers, but I have little doubt the form factor will still fall short of the dream of a truly pocket phone you can type decently well on.

cycomanic 4y ago
The N9 was not Symbian though. What I read was that there was a serious management culture issue at Nokia. Even before Elop Meego efforts were seriously sabotaged by the Symbian camp (the N9 was significantly delayed for example) . Mind you that memo and the decisions made were either incredibly stupid or part of a strategy by the shareholders to break apart Nokia. I mean apart from the fact that you tell the public that you don't believe in your product while selling it, they also decided to axe the Meego version N9 successor even though it was essentially ready. Many believe that was done to not risk it being a success, which would have revealed the whole strategy change to be wrong.
KronisLV 4y ago
> Symbian was the biggest problem with Nokia phones. I actually miss it, those were simpler times where your phone didn't spam you with ads or notifications or didn't get outdated every 2 years. No constant data collection or surveillance to the scales we deal with now. More so, I actually miss the feeling of how new everything was, in the sense that is you wanted to play some games you'd sometimes scour WAP sites for the game files (or pay exorbitant fees through magazines). There was a certain charm to games back then, too, seeing what people could knock together with Java on such a limited platform. Games like Gravity Defied, Galaxy on Fire or Gish, or even Doom RPG. I'm kind of nostalgic, admittedly, maybe for a time when not everything was so well optimized towards monetization. And before Wirth's law became so present on our devices.

kQq9oHeAz6wLLS 4y ago

> Here maps HERE was spun off, and is a great platform today. HERE WeGo is available for Android and iOS, plus web.

Joeri 4y ago
Nokia transit / HERE transit was my favorite public transit app back when I used windows phone. It had a unique way [1] of presenting transit options that was far more convenient than the simple list that every other app does. Sadly the current HERE WeGo app also does the simple scrolling list, so I see no reason to use it. [1] https://mspoweruser.com/nokia-here-transit-now-covers-46-uk-cities/ https://mspoweruser.com/nokia-here-transit-now-covers-46-uk-...
- morsch 4y ago
  Oeffi presents transit options in the same way. Don't know if the style has a name. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach.oeffi https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach....

mariusor 4y ago

Did you try the Jolla phones? They tried to carry the Meego torch in their Sailfish OS (which currently works well with "last year's" Sony phones). Even though it has different UI decisions than the N9 I found it reasonably good over time, and today some of it's decisions (like using swipes for navigation) made their way into other mainstream mobile OSes.

idonotknowwhy 4y ago
I bought the Xperia X and paid for Jolla with android support. It's a horrible buggy mess. Nothing like the smooth experience of the meego/Maemo n9
- mariusor 4y ago
  Weird, I had an Xperia XA2 for a long time and it was the opposite, no bugs to speak of. Now with a Xperia 10 III it's still pretty good.

idonotknowwhy 4y ago

Agreed. I loved my Nokia N9. The software was great! The Nokia N9 alarm clock was the best alarm clock app I've ever used. Android have copied some elements of this but it's nowhere near as simple! The hardware was fantastic as well. I dropped mine several times without a case and it never broke. The TI dac sounded great with my Sony XBA-3 iems I had at the time. I did hate the USB port cover though. And hated that they didn't have a dedicated camera button like the N8 and n97.

exodust 4y ago
The N9 was a regrettable purchase for me. I even feel that Nokia owes me, all these years later! Paid a lot for the 64 gig N9. Soon after Nokia abandoned the OS, and I felt ripped off. I remember the flash refused to stay off. I would disable flash for a photo, but next time I used camera the flash was back on. This was enough to move to a phone that remembered the flash setting. Years later I tried to start my N9 but it was demanding a password that I didn't know. Some kind of recovery password I never knew I had set up. There was no way I could find to reset the phone even to factory settings. It's basically bricked with no way to restore, so I couldn't even sell it as a working phone.

sgloutnikov 4y ago

Aw man the N9, good times. I still rock my glossy white N9 from time to time. Just realized that thing had 64GB of storage in 2011.

durnygbur 4y ago
That thing had also fully functional car navigation with all maps for free, and it had busybox shell... gosh how miserable are we now with smartphone options...

pharmakom 4y ago

How would Meego have succeeded where Windows Phone, which had Microsoft’s backing, failed?

black3r 4y ago
Applications. You can't take an existing Windows app and run it on Windows Phone, because the APIs are not there. You can take an existing Linux app and run it on Meego, because it's just a regular ARM Linux with a custom UI.
panick21_ 4y ago
Microsoft backing is a help? Seems to me having the backing of the Linux community would have been way better. Making UI for mostly existing apps, porting lots of existing apps over. Lots of free continues investments. Like you get other companies on board who use the same basic distro and apps and help with bug fixes and so on. You can use the same distro on phones, tables and even sell laptops with that software on it. And you can do all of that for no cost to anybody. Every single Nokia with Windows gives money away to Microsoft.

javier2 4y ago

Lol, I had an N900 and it was clunky at best. It was ok as a tech preview, but it wasnt a fantastic product by any means.

fignews 4y ago
The N900 did NOT run Meego. I agree with OP 100% that the N9 was an amazing phone. Honestly it was brilliant. Super smooth and well thought out. Polished too. With an android emulation layer on top it could have been a success. Alas Nokia got Elop’d.