3 ms·

I may be mistaken but wasn't there some cases of people convicted for owning drawings of CP?

by dudul 4y ago

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
bambax 4y ago
Really? That would be conceptually similar to AI-generated images. What would have been the rationale?
- ceejayoz 4y ago
  > That would be conceptually similar to AI-generated images. I would expect those to be similarly illegal in the same jurisdiction. > What would have been the rationale? If I see a photo of ice cream, I tend to crave real ice cream.
  - bambax 4y ago
    > If I see a photo of ice cream, I tend to crave real ice cream Would you say this works for other things? Esp. violence? Should all depictions of violence be banned? Or any undesirable behavior? The list may be long. But more importantly, what you're describing is advertising. An image of an ice cream isn't an ice cream. Porn works differently. It doesn't advertise for real sex. Porn conflates the representation and the thing itself into one; it delivers gratification directly, something an image of an ice cream doesn't do.
    - ceejayoz 4y ago
      > Would you say this works for other things? Esp. violence? If I find myself sexually aroused by violence. > But more importantly, what you're describing is advertising. Sure. We restrict or prohibit advertisements of certain things. Including child sexual abuse on that list is probably OK. > Porn works differently. It doesn't advertise for real sex. I'm not sure I agree. There are, for example, indications consumers of porn are more likely to request / engage in certain sex acts common in porn, like facials, anal sex, choking, etc. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32081698/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32081698/
      - yellowapple 4y ago
        > There are, for example, indications consumers of porn are more likely to request / engage in certain sex acts common in porn, like facials, anal sex, choking, etc. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32081698/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32081698/ The full paper is behind a paywall, but the abstract at least doesn't appear to make any conclusion w.r.t. causality. It's just as likely (if not more so) that people who are more likely to request / engage in certain sex acts will tend to prefer porn featuring them.
kevin_thibedeau 4y ago
Photoshops of adult bodies with non-adult heads.

I may be mistaken but wasn't there some cases of people convicted for owning drawings of CP?

by dudul 4y ago

I may be mistaken but wasn't there some cases of people convicted for owning drawings of CP?

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

bambax 4y ago

Really? That would be conceptually similar to AI-generated images. What would have been the rationale?

ceejayoz 4y ago
> That would be conceptually similar to AI-generated images. I would expect those to be similarly illegal in the same jurisdiction. > What would have been the rationale? If I see a photo of ice cream, I tend to crave real ice cream.
- bambax 4y ago
  > If I see a photo of ice cream, I tend to crave real ice cream Would you say this works for other things? Esp. violence? Should all depictions of violence be banned? Or any undesirable behavior? The list may be long. But more importantly, what you're describing is advertising. An image of an ice cream isn't an ice cream. Porn works differently. It doesn't advertise for real sex. Porn conflates the representation and the thing itself into one; it delivers gratification directly, something an image of an ice cream doesn't do.
  - ceejayoz 4y ago
    > Would you say this works for other things? Esp. violence? If I find myself sexually aroused by violence. > But more importantly, what you're describing is advertising. Sure. We restrict or prohibit advertisements of certain things. Including child sexual abuse on that list is probably OK. > Porn works differently. It doesn't advertise for real sex. I'm not sure I agree. There are, for example, indications consumers of porn are more likely to request / engage in certain sex acts common in porn, like facials, anal sex, choking, etc. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32081698/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32081698/
    - yellowapple 4y ago
      > There are, for example, indications consumers of porn are more likely to request / engage in certain sex acts common in porn, like facials, anal sex, choking, etc. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32081698/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32081698/ The full paper is behind a paywall, but the abstract at least doesn't appear to make any conclusion w.r.t. causality. It's just as likely (if not more so) that people who are more likely to request / engage in certain sex acts will tend to prefer porn featuring them.

kevin_thibedeau 4y ago

Photoshops of adult bodies with non-adult heads.