> "... Anyway, your argument about the security per dollar afforded by proof-of-stake makes total sense; Bitcoin's high energy costs are actually high security

> "... Anyway, your argument about the security per dollar afforded by proof-of-stake makes total sense; Bitcoin's high energy costs are actually high security costs." this interviewer is impressive; that's a complex point with evidence in recent writings by VB. Right there you can see that these questions are well-prepared