3 ms·

I think the solution should be to be more self-aware, not to jam highly invasive technology into vehicles. I don't want my car to have any sense of my "alertnes

I think the solution should be to be more self-aware, not to jam highly invasive technology into vehicles. I don't want my car to have any sense of my "alertness" at all, ever, I don't care if it keeps that data local, it should never ever be recording/monitoring it in the first place.

csours 4y ago
The problem with losing alertness is that you also lose your ability to monitor alertness.
thfuran 4y ago
Yeah, and we can rip out all those pointless and expensive seatbelts and crumple zones and airbags and replace them with just a bit more unerringness.
- djbebs 4y ago
  Yes we should.
  - thfuran 4y ago
    And then we can replace ambulances with hurses and arm the drivers. Think of the savings!
mistrial9 4y ago
when I was taught to drive by a professional driver, alertness, eye movement, passenger safety and control of the vehicle are part of the driving. After thirty years of safe driving, it is stunning to see people voting to include "alertness monitoring" .. you want that ?!? It seems like mental illness to me, to want that in your car, when you cannot turn it off.. Secondly I have posted about NO being tracked at all times, and gotten downvotes for that .. really honestly, what are you asking for voters?