What is there to discuss without details? Should we accept the partisan framing presented by the article that there that the current administration across all l

What is there to discuss without details? Should we accept the partisan framing presented by the article that there that the current administration across all levels of government are “secretly” instructing social networks to censor content, and go from there without any evidence or nuance? I think we can have a better discussion than that. Now, someone pointed out that I overlooked a link to the court filing. That’s my mistake. That would maybe spur a better discussion.