I sort of like the SurgeHQ blog from a few past articles I've read on it, and this article is similarly mostly thought-provoking and well-done. But it pulls off

I sort of like the SurgeHQ blog from a few past articles I've read on it, and this article is similarly mostly thought-provoking and well-done. But it pulls off 1 (arguably) disgusting trick IMO. It goes from talking about what users really want and then launches into some 'do you really want people to click on conspiracy theories' type of value-judgement that seems antithetical to actual user-preferences. Again, who decides what's true? Should it be the government? Should it be Mark Zuckerberg or other corporate giants? Is Mark Zuckerberg and others like him my parent who knows what's best for me? What if people actually want to see that content and decide for themselves what's true or not? Are the people to be treated as adults or children? That one thing from the article is probably not meaningful to most here, but I didn't like that specific part.