3 ms·

So we can't discuss it and it's no longer on the main page? Seems like there's alot of comments about the content as well.

• rashkov 4y ago
  What is there to discuss without details? Should we accept the partisan framing presented by the article that there that the current administration across all levels of government are “secretly” instructing social networks to censor content, and go from there without any evidence or nuance? I think we can have a better discussion than that. Now, someone pointed out that I overlooked a link to the court filing. That’s my mistake. That would maybe spur a better discussion.
  • pstuart 4y ago
    They argue in bad faith and there is no consensus to be had. Drives me crazy and I still try despite knowing this.
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]